An excellent article in The Guardian summarizes the current attacks on politically inconvenient science in the US. It is instructive to compare this with Stalin’s USSR. The parallel is unfortunately too close for comfort.

Trofim Lysenko was an agronomist who devised a method to improve the yield of winter wheat, an important achievement in a country suffering from famine due in large part to criminally incompetent mismanagement by Communist central planners. He believed in a form of Lamarck’s theories, that basically species evolve by transmitting inherited characteristics, rather than by natural selection and survival of the fittest.

Lysenko led a series of attacks on genetics, beginning in the mid thirties and culminating with the purge of of the father of Soviet genetics, Nikolai Vavilov in 1940 (initially sentenced to death, he died in 1943 while in solitary confinement). Lysenko then assumed complete control over Soviet agronomical “science”, all modern genetics starting with Mendel’s laws were banned (some of Vavilov’s vital work on biodiversity survived, but is endangered today), and the most outlandish theories (like spontaneous generation of germs) promulgated.

The Communist regime found Lysenko’s theories congenial, as they offered the perspective of genetically improving homo sovieticus using the same brutal tactics applied to Russian arts, religion and history.

Vavilov was rehabilitated when Nikita Khrushchev came to power, but Lysenko managed to hold on, in part with flattery, in part with outright fraud to cover up his lack of results. He was finally sacked in 1965, when the damage he had done in thirty years became impossible to ignore.