Comments on: Scientific papers now citing blogs? http://majid.info/blog/scientific-papers-citing-blogs/ Sporadic pontification Sun, 13 May 2012 10:26:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Fabrice http://majid.info/blog/scientific-papers-citing-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-1154 Fabrice Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:14:10 +0000 http://majid.info/blog/?p=141242104#comment-1154 When I was correcting students' papers as a TA, students were getting less for quoting wikipedia, and failed for plagiarising wikipedia. Ok, that did not make me any more popular with them... When I was correcting students’ papers as a TA, students were getting less for quoting wikipedia, and failed for plagiarising wikipedia.
Ok, that did not make me any more popular with them…

]]> By: Jeffrey Friedl http://majid.info/blog/scientific-papers-citing-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-1153 Jeffrey Friedl Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:51:06 +0000 http://majid.info/blog/?p=141242104#comment-1153 Perhaps the takeaway is not that "blogs" aren't considered authoritative, but that you are. :-) They refer to dcraw as "public domain", so it's not like they're really minding all their Ps and Qs. (In fairness, I don't publish rigorous scientific papers, so glass houses and stones and all that apply to me.) Perhaps the takeaway is not that “blogs” aren’t considered authoritative, but that you are. :-)

They refer to dcraw as “public domain”, so it’s not like they’re really minding all their Ps and Qs.
(In fairness, I don’t publish rigorous scientific papers, so glass houses and stones and all that apply to me.)

]]>