Comments on: Panasonic GF1 first impressions http://majid.info/blog/panasonic-gf1-first-impressions/ Sporadic pontification Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:47:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: majid http://majid.info/blog/panasonic-gf1-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-728 majid Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:12:49 +0000 http://majid.info/blog/?p=477#comment-728 That's a test of the GH1, not the GF1. The GF1's sensor is probably closer to the G1 than the GH1, since it does not have the latter's multi-aspect capabilities. The GH1 outperforms the E-P1, but the E-P1 has better high-ISO performance than the GF1. The GF1 is a great little (well, relatively little) camera, and Panasonic's success in taking third place in the Japanese market is well justified. I am quite happy at Sony's discomfiture—I actively boycott them since the DRM rootkit fiasco. That’s a test of the GH1, not the GF1. The GF1′s sensor is probably closer to the G1 than the GH1, since it does not have the latter’s multi-aspect capabilities. The GH1 outperforms the E-P1, but the E-P1 has better high-ISO performance than the GF1.
The GF1 is a great little (well, relatively little) camera, and Panasonic’s success in taking third place in the Japanese market is well justified. I am quite happy at Sony’s discomfiture—I actively boycott them since the DRM rootkit fiasco.

]]> By: terry chay http://majid.info/blog/panasonic-gf1-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-727 terry chay Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:02:22 +0000 http://majid.info/blog/?p=477#comment-727 You might be interested to read that DxO finally tested its image quality http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/DxOMark-Sensor/DxOMark-reviews/DxOMark-review-for-the-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-GH1 You might be interested to read that DxO finally tested its image quality

http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/DxOMark-Sensor/DxOMark-reviews/DxOMark-review-for-the-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-GH1

]]>